Guides

The EXIST Lebenslauf: how to write the CV reviewers actually score

The team section is half the score. Your CV is the evidence behind it - and the place most founders waste a chronological page.

EXIST
Lebenslauf
Team
Julia Yukovich
Julia YukovichCo-Founder + CEO
·April 8, 2026·
4 min read

Key takeaways

EXIST funds people, not just ideas. The CV is graded against the role each founder will fill.
Two pages per founder, role-anchored, not a chronological résumé dump.
The Gründungsteam must cover technical, commercial, and a third complementary role. Gaps must be named, not hidden.
Step by step
1

Write the role line first

For each founder, write the one sentence that says what they own in the venture. This is the spine the rest of the CV hangs off.

2

Map experience to the role, drop the rest

Go through your full work history and keep only the entries that prove you can fill the role or that you finish things. Everything else is archive - cut it.

3

Add the academic + commitment lines

Make the university connection explicit and add the line that shows you are serious. These two are the most often forgotten and the most often scored.

4

Unify the format across founders

Same font, same headings, same date format across every team CV. Mismatched CVs read as an uncoordinated team.

Why the CV carries more weight than founders expect

The EXIST Gründerstipendium pays a person a monthly stipend to spend a year building. That structure means the question reviewers cannot get past is not "is the idea good" but "can this specific team execute it." The Ideenpapier argues the opportunity; the Lebenslauf is the evidence that the opportunity is in the right hands. A brilliant idea attached to a team that has never shipped anything is a borderline application; a solid idea attached to a credible team is fundable.

So treat the CV as an argument, not an archive. Every line should answer one of two questions: does this person have the skill to fill their role, or do they have evidence that they finish things. A semester abroad is archive. A side project with two thousand users is evidence.

Role anchoring: the structure that beats chronology

Open each founder CV with one line that states the role: "Technical lead - responsible for the ML pipeline and infrastructure" or "Commercial lead - responsible for go-to-market, pricing, and first customers." Then organise the rest under that role. Reviewers reading a stack of fifty Anträge do not want to reconstruct who does what from a list of job titles; tell them in the first line, then prove it.

A complete Gründungsteam covers three bases: someone who can build the product, someone who can sell it, and a third role that fits the specific venture (regulatory for healthtech, design for a consumer app, hardware for a deeptech). If your team is two technical co-founders, do not pretend one of you is commercial. Name the gap and explain how you close it - a named advisor, a planned hire funded by a later round, a co-founder search already running. Reviewers respect a named gap far more than a faked competency.

The four lines reviewers look for in every CV

Across hundreds of EXIST CVs the same four signals separate the credible from the thin. Make sure each founder CV contains at least three of them, explicitly.

Domain depth: a degree, thesis, or job that put you inside the problem you now want to solve. The closer the prior work sits to the venture, the stronger.
Shipping evidence: something you finished and put in front of real users - an open-source project, a paper with citations, a product that earned its first euro, a hackathon win that turned into something.
The academic link: for EXIST specifically, the connection to the university - which lab, which professor, which research result the venture builds on. This line doubles as proof your idea qualifies as Hochschul-affiliated at all.
Commitment signal: evidence that you are serious about this, not browsing. A founder who has already left a comfortable job, relocated, or turned down an offer to pursue the venture reads as committed - and reviewers do bet on commitment.

Length, format, and the mistakes that cost a half-point

Two pages per founder is the right length. One page reads as thin for a person you are asking the state to bet a year of stipend on; three pages reads as padded. Use a clean, consistent format across all founders - mismatched CV styles in one application signal a team that did not coordinate, which is exactly the doubt you do not want to plant.

Cut the things that add nothing: hobbies, your Abitur grade if you have a degree, language levels below B2, a photo unless the call asks for one. Add the things founders forget: the exact role split, dates with no unexplained multi-year gaps (name a gap if it exists - sabbatical, illness, care work), and a one-line statement of why this team, for this idea, now.

FAQ

Frequently asked

Try Grants

Free plan, no credit card. We host in Germany. You can export and delete everything self-serve.

Julia Yukovich

Written by

Julia Yukovich

Co-Founder + CEO

Julia is one of the Co-Founders. She handles design, product direction, and most of the support replies that arrive in the morning.

julia.yukovich at aicuflow dot comLinkedIn