Compare
Plain-language privacy notice, standard German GDPR DPA available on request, self-serve export + delete.

GDPR isn't a checkbox - it's a posture. If you're moving off Microsoft Word because their AVV / DPA is opaque, Grants is what a clean alternative looks like: subprocessor list of two (Stripe + mail relay), self-serve export + delete from account settings, and a standard German GDPR DPA on request when your procurement team needs one.
Word is excellent at one thing: any document. The trade-off for that flexibility is zero structure when you sit down to write an EXIST Gründerstipendium Ideenpapier. Grants ships the section structure (Idea, Innovation, Market, Team, Plan) reviewers actually open the PDF looking for - plus deadline tracking, status, and the 4-week revision window that gets a "zur Nachbesserung zurückgegeben" Antrag back into the awarded pile.
GDPR posture
Three things matter under GDPR for a tool like this: (1) lawful basis for processing, (2) data subject rights (export, delete, port), and (3) the auftragsverarbeitungsvertrag / DPA chain. Grants treats them as engineering invariants, not legal optics. Lawful basis is the contract you sign with us. Subject rights are self-serve from your account settings - no support ticket required. The subprocessor list has two entries (Stripe + mail relay). A standard German GDPR DPA is available on request from /sales whenever your procurement team needs one - we don't charge for it and don't gate it behind a plan tier. Where Microsoft Word sits on each of these is the rest of this page.
final_v17_finalfinal.docx.GDPR questions
Free plan, no credit card. We host in Germany. Export + delete are self-serve.
Read next
Full Grants vs Microsoft Word
Where Word still wins, and where it costs you the grant.
Read
Grants vs Google Docs for grant applications
Honest comparison - co-editing wins, structure does not.
Read
Grants vs hiring a Förderberatung
When the percentage cut is the deal-breaker.
Read
Grants vs writing your EXIST application with ChatGPT
Why generic AI fails at the EXIST review.
Read
| Ours Grants | Theirs Microsoft Word | |
|---|---|---|
Section structure for EXIST/IGP | ||
Deadline + status tracking | ||
PTJ language conventions | ||
Multi-author live editing | ||
Works fully offline | ||
Existing reviewer template files | ||
Hosted in Germany | Microsoft 365: depends on your setup |