Compare

Grants vs Microsoft Word for EXIST applications

Word knows nothing about EXIST. Pasting an Ideenpapier into a blank docx is the slow road to a rejection.

EXIST

Word

Finn GlasCo-Founder + Engineering

·December 17, 2025·

1 min read

At a glance

Word is excellent at one thing: any document. The trade-off for that flexibility is zero structure when you sit down to write an EXIST Gründerstipendium Ideenpapier. Grants ships the section structure (Idea, Innovation, Market, Team, Plan) reviewers actually open the PDF looking for - plus deadline tracking, status, and the 4-week revision window that gets a "zur Nachbesserung zurückgegeben" Antrag back into the awarded pile.

Grants vs Microsoft Word: feature comparison

	Ours Grants	Theirs Microsoft Word
Section structure for EXIST/IGP
Deadline + status tracking
PTJ language conventions
Multi-author live editing
Works fully offline
Existing reviewer template files
Hosted in Germany		Microsoft 365: depends on your setup

When to pick which

Pick Grants when

You are writing an EXIST, Forschungstransfer, IGP, or BW Pre-Seed application and want the structure handed to you.

Two or three co-founders edit the same draft and you do not want to rename final_v17_finalfinal.docx.

Submission deadline matters. The 4-week revision window after a Nachbesserungs-Aufforderung matters more.

Pick Microsoft Word when

You already have a reviewer template Word file from your university and the reviewer expects exactly that file.

You write the entire application offline on long flights.

Share this article

Try Grants

Free plan, no credit card. We host in Germany. You can export and delete everything self-serve.

Written by

Finn Glas

Co-Founder + Engineering

Finn is one of the Co-Founders. He owns the engineering side, the infrastructure, and most of the late-night fixes that ship before anyone notices.

finn.glas at aicuflow dot comLinkedIn Website