Can Claude / ChatGPT / Cursor use Grants directly?

Yes, via the MCP server. It's a stdio JSON-RPC server that wires into Claude Desktop, Cursor, or any MCP-aware client in five lines of config. The list of tools matches your data model 1:1 - whatever a CRUD type exposes in the UI is exposed identically to the agent.

Do agent calls share the same auth + access controls?

Yes. The MCP server authenticates with the same JWT or PAT a human session uses. Sharing rules, org membership, rate limits, suspicion bans - all of it applies. There's no "agent backdoor" that bypasses the access matrix.

Is there an audit trail for agent actions?

Yes. Every mutation goes through the same audit-log path as a UI click. The transport (UI / API / CLI / MCP) is recorded as channel metadata so you can filter "what did the agent do this hour" from your account history.

Can I rate-limit an agent separately from a human?

Per-token rate limits apply, so you can issue an agent its own PAT and cap it independently. The shared user-level bucket also caps total throughput, so a runaway loop can't drain your whole account. The CLI's auto-update channel marker means you can also see in audit which version is calling.

Does the MCP / API surface cost extra?

No. Same plan, same surface. We don't paywall the agent - it's the same product, the same schema, the same access gates. If a plan can do X in the UI, it can do X via MCP.

Grants

Assess Directory Programmes Fairs

Compare

Grants: the agent-friendly alternative to Microsoft Word

Same product, same surface for humans and AI agents. MCP server + CLI + drop-in clients in 15 languages.

Agentic alternative

EXIST

Word

Finn GlasCo-Founder + Engineering

·December 17, 2025·

1 min read

Grants ships an MCP server you can wire into Claude Desktop or any MCP client in five lines. The same auth + access gates apply, the same audit log records every action, the same rate limits apply. Microsoft Word doesn't currently expose this surface - that's the gap.

At a glance

Word is excellent at one thing: any document. The trade-off for that flexibility is zero structure when you sit down to write an EXIST Gründerstipendium Ideenpapier. Grants ships the section structure (Idea, Innovation, Market, Team, Plan) reviewers actually open the PDF looking for - plus deadline tracking, status, and the 4-week revision window that gets a "zur Nachbesserung zurückgegeben" Antrag back into the awarded pile.

Agent surface

What 'agent-friendly' actually means in practice

Grants ships an MCP server, a CLI, and drop-in clients in 15 languages. They're auto-generated from the same schema your UI uses; the auth, the access gates, the rate limits, the audit log all apply identically whether you're clicking buttons or calling the API. Microsoft Word doesn't currently expose this surface, which is the gap a serious agent integration trips over - the agent ends up scraping the UI through a browser, which is fragile, slow, and silently bypasses everything below.

Grants vs Microsoft Word: agent-readiness comparison

	Ours Grants	Theirs Microsoft Word
Section structure for EXIST/IGP
Deadline + status tracking
PTJ language conventions
Multi-author live editing
Works fully offline
Existing reviewer template files
Hosted in Germany		Microsoft 365: depends on your setup

When to pick which

Pick Grants when

You are writing an EXIST, Forschungstransfer, IGP, or BW Pre-Seed application and want the structure handed to you.

Two or three co-founders edit the same draft and you do not want to rename final_v17_finalfinal.docx.

Submission deadline matters. The 4-week revision window after a Nachbesserungs-Aufforderung matters more.

Pick Microsoft Word when

You already have a reviewer template Word file from your university and the reviewer expects exactly that file.

You write the entire application offline on long flights.

Agentic-integration questions

What an agent-builder asks before wiring a tool into Claude / ChatGPT / Cursor.

Start with Grants

Free plan, no credit card. We host in Germany. Export + delete are self-serve.

Written by

Finn Glas

Co-Founder + Engineering

Finn is one of the Co-Founders. He owns the engineering side, the infrastructure, and most of the late-night fixes that ship before anyone notices.

finn.glas at aicuflow dot comLinkedIn Website