Can Claude / ChatGPT / Cursor use Grants directly?

Yes, via the MCP server. It's a stdio JSON-RPC server that wires into Claude Desktop, Cursor, or any MCP-aware client in five lines of config. The list of tools matches your data model 1:1 - whatever a CRUD type exposes in the UI is exposed identically to the agent.

Do agent calls share the same auth + access controls?

Yes. The MCP server authenticates with the same JWT or PAT a human session uses. Sharing rules, org membership, rate limits, suspicion bans - all of it applies. There's no "agent backdoor" that bypasses the access matrix.

Is there an audit trail for agent actions?

Yes. Every mutation goes through the same audit-log path as a UI click. The transport (UI / API / CLI / MCP) is recorded as channel metadata so you can filter "what did the agent do this hour" from your account history.

Can I rate-limit an agent separately from a human?

Per-token rate limits apply, so you can issue an agent its own PAT and cap it independently. The shared user-level bucket also caps total throughput, so a runaway loop can't drain your whole account. The CLI's auto-update channel marker means you can also see in audit which version is calling.

Does the MCP / API surface cost extra?

No. Same plan, same surface. We don't paywall the agent - it's the same product, the same schema, the same access gates. If a plan can do X in the UI, it can do X via MCP.

Grants

Assess Directory Programmes Fairs

Compare

Grants: the agent-friendly alternative to Google Docs

Same product, same surface for humans and AI agents. MCP server + CLI + drop-in clients in 15 languages.

Agentic alternative

EXIST

Google Docs

Finn GlasCo-Founder + Engineering

·March 6, 2026·

1 min read

Grants ships an MCP server you can wire into Claude Desktop or any MCP client in five lines. The same auth + access gates apply, the same audit log records every action, the same rate limits apply. Google Docs doesn't currently expose this surface - that's the gap.

At a glance

Google Docs is the default for two-person founder teams - free, real-time, share-by-link. Grants trades the generic-document flexibility for purpose-built grant structure: an Ideenpapier outline reviewers expect, deadline + status carried forward, the 4-week post-rejection revision window tracked. Hosted in Germany. Pick Docs for the long tail of "any document"; pick us for the EXIST.

Agent surface

What 'agent-friendly' actually means in practice

Grants ships an MCP server, a CLI, and drop-in clients in 15 languages. They're auto-generated from the same schema your UI uses; the auth, the access gates, the rate limits, the audit log all apply identically whether you're clicking buttons or calling the API. Google Docs doesn't currently expose this surface, which is the gap a serious agent integration trips over - the agent ends up scraping the UI through a browser, which is fragile, slow, and silently bypasses everything below.

Grants vs Google Docs: agent-readiness comparison

	Ours Grants	Theirs Google Docs
Real-time co-editing
Section structure for EXIST/IGP
Deadline + status tracking
Hosted in Germany
Free tier
Numbering survives 30+ pages

When to pick which

Pick Grants when

EU/German hosting is required by your university, your investors, or your own conviction.

Submission is more than 20 pages, with figures, references, and a budget table.

Pick Google Docs when

Your team already lives in Workspace and the cost of a tool switch outweighs the structure win.

Agentic-integration questions

What an agent-builder asks before wiring a tool into Claude / ChatGPT / Cursor.

Start with Grants

Free plan, no credit card. We host in Germany. Export + delete are self-serve.

Written by

Finn Glas

Co-Founder + Engineering

Finn is one of the Co-Founders. He owns the engineering side, the infrastructure, and most of the late-night fixes that ship before anyone notices.

finn.glas at aicuflow dot comLinkedIn Website