Compare
Plain-language privacy notice, standard German GDPR DPA available on request, self-serve export + delete.

GDPR isn't a checkbox - it's a posture. If you're moving off ChatGPT / generic LLMs because their AVV / DPA is opaque, Grants is what a clean alternative looks like: subprocessor list of two (Stripe + mail relay), self-serve export + delete from account settings, and a standard German GDPR DPA on request when your procurement team needs one.
ChatGPT is unmatched at getting something on the page when you are blank. It is also unmistakably ChatGPT - reviewers spot the cadence in two paragraphs, the safety-rounded conclusions, the "moreover, furthermore" connective tissue. Grants carries the missing context: PTJ language conventions, EXIST review criteria, common rejection reasons (no academic anchor, innovation threshold not met, no LoIs from customers). Use ChatGPT to start; use us to finish.
GDPR posture
Three things matter under GDPR for a tool like this: (1) lawful basis for processing, (2) data subject rights (export, delete, port), and (3) the auftragsverarbeitungsvertrag / DPA chain. Grants treats them as engineering invariants, not legal optics. Lawful basis is the contract you sign with us. Subject rights are self-serve from your account settings - no support ticket required. The subprocessor list has two entries (Stripe + mail relay). A standard German GDPR DPA is available on request from /sales whenever your procurement team needs one - we don't charge for it and don't gate it behind a plan tier. Where ChatGPT / generic LLMs sits on each of these is the rest of this page.
GDPR questions
Free plan, no credit card. We host in Germany. Export + delete are self-serve.
Read next
Full Grants vs ChatGPT / generic LLMs
Why generic AI fails at the EXIST review.
Read
Behind the scenes: how Grants reviews your EXIST application
An inside look at our four review dimensions.
Read
Success story: how aicuflow secured EXIST funding
Clear application, pilot customers, and follow-on financing planned early.
Read
Grants vs Microsoft Word for EXIST applications
Where Word still wins, and where it costs you the grant.
Read
| Ours Grants | Theirs ChatGPT / generic LLMs | |
|---|---|---|
Knows what PTJ reads for | ||
Knows EXIST review criteria | ||
Generic-tone detection feedback | ||
Free for unlimited drafts | ||
Hosted in Germany / no US training | ||
Strong at translating EN ↔ DE | Adequate |