Can Claude / ChatGPT / Cursor use Grants directly?

Yes, via the MCP server. It's a stdio JSON-RPC server that wires into Claude Desktop, Cursor, or any MCP-aware client in five lines of config. The list of tools matches your data model 1:1 - whatever a CRUD type exposes in the UI is exposed identically to the agent.

Do agent calls share the same auth + access controls?

Yes. The MCP server authenticates with the same JWT or PAT a human session uses. Sharing rules, org membership, rate limits, suspicion bans - all of it applies. There's no "agent backdoor" that bypasses the access matrix.

Is there an audit trail for agent actions?

Yes. Every mutation goes through the same audit-log path as a UI click. The transport (UI / API / CLI / MCP) is recorded as channel metadata so you can filter "what did the agent do this hour" from your account history.

Can I rate-limit an agent separately from a human?

Per-token rate limits apply, so you can issue an agent its own PAT and cap it independently. The shared user-level bucket also caps total throughput, so a runaway loop can't drain your whole account. The CLI's auto-update channel marker means you can also see in audit which version is calling.

Does the MCP / API surface cost extra?

No. Same plan, same surface. We don't paywall the agent - it's the same product, the same schema, the same access gates. If a plan can do X in the UI, it can do X via MCP.

Grants

Assess Directory Programmes Fairs

Compare

Grants: the agent-friendly alternative to Förderberatungen / agencies

Same product, same surface for humans and AI agents. MCP server + CLI + drop-in clients in 15 languages.

Agentic alternative

EXIST

Consultants

Cost

Finn GlasCo-Founder + Engineering

·June 28, 2026·

6 min read

·Updated

Grants ships an MCP server you can wire into Claude Desktop or any MCP client in five lines. The same auth + access gates apply, the same audit log records every action, the same rate limits apply. Förderberatungen / agencies doesn't currently expose this surface - that's the gap.

At a glance

Förderberatungen are real experts and earn their keep on six-figure Forschungstransfer Phase II awards. For a Gründerstipendium-sized application (€139,600 over 12 months) the typical 15% commission lands at €20,940 - paid out of money you have not seen yet, on a grant you may not be awarded. And read the contract twice: many agencies bill the percentage on the applied project costs, not the awarded sum, which can turn a quoted "5%" into an effective third of what actually lands in your account. Grants charges a flat monthly fee, you keep the cheque, and the structural and language wins are about 80% of what a senior consultant brings. This is software, not Rechts- or Steuerberatung, and no tool or consultant can promise you the grant. Before signing with anyone, read our guide to negotiating consultant fees. Pick a consultant when the stakes are eight figures or the process is genuinely beyond your capacity; pick us for the rest.

Agent surface

What 'agent-friendly' actually means in practice

Grants ships an MCP server, a CLI, and drop-in clients in 15 languages. They're auto-generated from the same schema your UI uses; the auth, the access gates, the rate limits, the audit log all apply identically whether you're clicking buttons or calling the API. Förderberatungen / agencies doesn't currently expose this surface, which is the gap a serious agent integration trips over - the agent ends up scraping the UI through a browser, which is fragile, slow, and silently bypasses everything below.

Grants vs Förderberatungen / agencies: agent-readiness comparison

	Ours Grants	Theirs Förderberatungen / agencies
Cost on a €139,600 EXIST award	~€100/yr	~€20,000
Fee charged on… Award vs applied project costs	Flat - no % at all	Often applied costs
Upfront fee, win or lose		€2k-€8k common
Takes on small grants
PTJ language conventions
Pre-submission criteria check
Hands-on writing for you
Builds in-house grant skill for next round
Works for rival applicants in the same call	Never	Possible
You keep authorship + IP of the text		Negotiable
Available evenings + weekends
Hosted in Germany		Depends

When to pick which

Pick Grants when

Your award would be in the €60k-€200k range and a percentage fee is hard to swallow.

You want to keep the writing - and the IP - inside your own team.

You apply to multiple grants per year and need a tool, not a single engagement.

You want to build in-house grant-writing muscle, because the next round will come.

The consultant fine print scares you: % on applied costs, upfront fees, or auto-renewal clauses.

Pick Förderberatungen / agencies when

The application is Forschungstransfer Phase II or larger and a senior consultant's review is worth six figures.

You have zero capacity to write yourself and prefer to delegate the entire process.

Your grant runs through complex tax integration (e.g. Forschungszulage Phase 2) where roughly 60% of the real work happens after the Bescheinigung.

A consultant has genuine insider context on your specific reviewer panel or the politics of a multi-partner Verbund.

Agentic-integration questions

What an agent-builder asks before wiring a tool into Claude / ChatGPT / Cursor.

Start with Grants

Free plan, no credit card. We host in Germany. Export + delete are self-serve.

Written by

Finn Glas

Co-Founder + Engineering

Finn is one of the Co-Founders. He owns the engineering side, the infrastructure, and most of the late-night fixes that ship before anyone notices.

finn.glas at aicuflow dot comLinkedIn Website